Huxley, please? (Score: 3, Insightful) by gerty@pipedot.org on 2014-05-19 23:25 (#1RS) Brave New World seems to be missing?! I'll settle with 1984 then. It is probably the scariest and one of the least far-fetched. Re: Huxley, please? (Score: 3, Insightful) by preston@pipedot.org on 2014-05-19 23:31 (#1RV) +1 for brave new world Re: Huxley, please? (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on 2014-05-20 09:18 (#1S5) Yes, awesome idea. Wish we'd added Aldous Huxley; he was a genius and I almost wonder if he won't be more correct than Orwell was. Worse, we're probably headed to a place where a little bit of both are the norm. Worse, unlike Sky Captain, no Gwyneth Paltrow in thigh-high stockings.
Re: Huxley, please? (Score: 3, Insightful) by preston@pipedot.org on 2014-05-19 23:31 (#1RV) +1 for brave new world Re: Huxley, please? (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on 2014-05-20 09:18 (#1S5) Yes, awesome idea. Wish we'd added Aldous Huxley; he was a genius and I almost wonder if he won't be more correct than Orwell was. Worse, we're probably headed to a place where a little bit of both are the norm. Worse, unlike Sky Captain, no Gwyneth Paltrow in thigh-high stockings.
Re: Huxley, please? (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on 2014-05-20 09:18 (#1S5) Yes, awesome idea. Wish we'd added Aldous Huxley; he was a genius and I almost wonder if he won't be more correct than Orwell was. Worse, we're probably headed to a place where a little bit of both are the norm. Worse, unlike Sky Captain, no Gwyneth Paltrow in thigh-high stockings.