US senator grills CEO over the myth of the hacker-proof voting machine
A US senator is holding the nation's biggest voting machine maker to account following a recent article that reported it has sold equipment that was pre-installed with remote-access software and has advised government customers to install the software on machines that didn't already have it pre-installed.
Use of remote-access software in e-voting systems was reported last month by The New York Times Magazine in an article headlined "The Myth of the Hacker-Proof Voting Machine." The article challenged the oft-repeated assurance that voting machines are generally secured against malicious tampering because they're not connected to the Internet.
Exhibit A in the case built by freelance reporter Kim Zetter was an election-management computer used in 2016 by Pennsylvania's Venango County. After voting machines the county bought from Election Systems & Software were suspected of "flipping" votes"meaning screens showed a different vote than the one selected by the voter"officials asked a computer scientist to examine the systems. The scientist ultimately concluded the flipping was the result of a simple calibration error, but during the analysis he found something much more alarming"remote-access software that allowed anyone with the correct password to remotely control the system.
Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments