Article 446XJ GDP is not a good measure of wellbeing – it's too materialistic | Joseph Stiglitz

GDP is not a good measure of wellbeing – it's too materialistic | Joseph Stiglitz

by
Joseph Stiglitz
from Economics | The Guardian on (#446XJ)

Why focus on production of goods, rather than on health, education and environment?

Just under 10 years ago, the international Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress issued its report, Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn't Add Up. The title summed it up: GDP is not a good measure of wellbeing. What we measure affects what we do: if we measure the wrong thing, we will do the wrong thing. If we focus only on material wellbeing - on, say, the production of goods, rather than on health, education, and the environment - we become distorted in the same way that these measures are distorted; we become more materialistic.

We were more than pleased with the reception of our report, which spurred an international movement of academics, civil society, and governments to construct and employ metrics that reflected a broader conception of wellbeing. The OECD has constructed a better life index, containing a range of metrics that better reflect what constitutes and leads to wellbeing. It also supported a successor to the commission, the High Level Expert Group on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Last week, at the OECD's sixth World Forum on Statistics, Knowledge, and Policy in Incheon, South Korea, the group issued its report, Beyond GDP: Measuring What Counts for Economic and Social Performance.

Related: Trump's trade wars and Brexit are making us all poorer | Jeffrey Frankel

Continue reading...
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.theguardian.com/theguardian/business/economics/rss
Feed Title Economics | The Guardian
Feed Link https://www.theguardian.com/business/economics
Feed Copyright Guardian News & Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. 2024
Reply 0 comments