Radiant heat loss (Score: 5, Insightful) by fishybell@pipedot.org on 2014-03-12 20:38 (#H4) Except that in space you only have heat loss due to radiation rather than conduction, which is quite a bit more efficient.Add to that the cost of upgrading obsolete servers, and I don't (forgive the pun) see this taking off anytime soon. Re: Radiant heat loss (Score: 1) by billshooterofbul@pipedot.org on 2014-03-12 21:10 (#H6) Its been a while since my thermodynamics class in college, does the radiation given off depend upon the difference in temps? I mean, at some point a greater temperature differential would offset the loss of conduction, right?My intuition would expect that an object at 60 C in a room with air at 59 C would cool slower than an object at 60 C in the vacuum of space. Re: Radiant heat loss (Score: 4, Informative) by quadrox@pipedot.org on 2014-03-13 07:13 (#HD) Your intuition would be right for conductive cooling such as air/water cooling, but the amount of heat that is radiated only depends on the temparature of the object, the environment doesn't influence this in any way. Re: Radiant heat loss (Score: 1) by billshooterofbul@pipedot.org on 2014-03-13 14:44 (#HM) Thanks for the right answer. That makes sense now that I think back on it. I'd have to agree that kind of sucks for cooling then.
Re: Radiant heat loss (Score: 1) by billshooterofbul@pipedot.org on 2014-03-12 21:10 (#H6) Its been a while since my thermodynamics class in college, does the radiation given off depend upon the difference in temps? I mean, at some point a greater temperature differential would offset the loss of conduction, right?My intuition would expect that an object at 60 C in a room with air at 59 C would cool slower than an object at 60 C in the vacuum of space. Re: Radiant heat loss (Score: 4, Informative) by quadrox@pipedot.org on 2014-03-13 07:13 (#HD) Your intuition would be right for conductive cooling such as air/water cooling, but the amount of heat that is radiated only depends on the temparature of the object, the environment doesn't influence this in any way. Re: Radiant heat loss (Score: 1) by billshooterofbul@pipedot.org on 2014-03-13 14:44 (#HM) Thanks for the right answer. That makes sense now that I think back on it. I'd have to agree that kind of sucks for cooling then.
Re: Radiant heat loss (Score: 4, Informative) by quadrox@pipedot.org on 2014-03-13 07:13 (#HD) Your intuition would be right for conductive cooling such as air/water cooling, but the amount of heat that is radiated only depends on the temparature of the object, the environment doesn't influence this in any way. Re: Radiant heat loss (Score: 1) by billshooterofbul@pipedot.org on 2014-03-13 14:44 (#HM) Thanks for the right answer. That makes sense now that I think back on it. I'd have to agree that kind of sucks for cooling then.
Re: Radiant heat loss (Score: 1) by billshooterofbul@pipedot.org on 2014-03-13 14:44 (#HM) Thanks for the right answer. That makes sense now that I think back on it. I'd have to agree that kind of sucks for cooling then.