Article 3RAED San Francisco to Uber, Lyft: If your drivers aren’t employees, prove it

San Francisco to Uber, Lyft: If your drivers aren’t employees, prove it

by
Cyrus Farivar
from Ars Technica - All content on (#3RAED)
GettyImages-917398260-800x531.jpg

Enlarge / The Uber ride-sharing app is seen on a mobile phone on February 12, 2018. (credit: Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

San Francisco's city attorney has issued formal subpoenas to Uber and Lyft in order to ascertain whether the ride-sharing companies classify their drivers as employees or contractors in the wake of a landmark decision handed down by the California Supreme Court earlier this month.

Under the opinion in that case, known as Dynamex, the court found that workers can only be considered contractors under a three-part test that seeks to determine exactly how independent they are.

City Attorney Dennis Herrera will now seek "proof that Uber and Lyft have lawfully classified drivers as independent contractors or provide their drivers with minimum wage, sick leave, health care contributions, and paid parental leave."

Read 3 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=Dk3HAK4IvBA:Bo2Jy6U3Gys:V_sGLiPB index?i=Dk3HAK4IvBA:Bo2Jy6U3Gys:F7zBnMyn index?d=qj6IDK7rITs index?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/index
Feed Title Ars Technica - All content
Feed Link https://arstechnica.com/
Reply 0 comments