Article 40H18 Law Says Scotland Can No Longer Put the Shetland Islands in a Box

Law Says Scotland Can No Longer Put the Shetland Islands in a Box

by
from Lowering the Bar on (#40H18)
shetland-777.jpg?fit=300%2C169

Private citizens can box the Shetland Islands all they want, and of course the law doesn't apply outside Scotland. But as of October 4, 2018, it is illegal for any public authority in Scotland to publish a map on which the Shetland Islands appear anywhere other than their correct geographical location in relation to the rest of Scotland.

Here's the problem:

map_of_scotland.jpg?resize=466%2C350

Shetlands in a Box (lonelyplanet.com)

The Shetland Islands aren't east of Aberdeen. They also aren't north of Lewis or in the Moray Firth, which are other places they apparently get stuck a lot. This is because they are so far north that including them in a map with the rest of Scotland means there's gonna be a whole lot of blue on that map:

here-they-be.jpg?resize=600%2C837

Hence, the Shetlands generally are rudely uprooted from their natural habitat, crammed into a box, and depicted somewhere they are not.

This, apparently, could no longer be tolerated.

"My contention is the islands should be in the right place on the map," Shetland MP Tavish Scott said in March. And that isn't the Moray Firth, the big dent northeast of Inverness where the islands often are put.

"If [the Shetlands were] closer to the Moray Firth," Scott was quoted as saying, "or indeed in the Moray Firth, I wouldn't need to spend 12 hours going home on the boat from Aberdeen overnight." (In fact it takes 12 .) But rather than take the practical approach of moving the islands closer, Scott's proposal would make the maps bigger. The point, he said, "is simply to ensure that in future that government publications and documents do reflect the reality of Scotland in terms of its geography, and not something that fits neatly on an A4 sheet of paper." This is important, he insisted, because of the misconception that the islands are nearer to the mainland than they actually are.

They are further away, and not surrounded by an actual box, you see.

I was a little skeptical about this one, so I did some checking. And unless I'm missing something, section 17 of the Islands (Scotland) Act 2018 does indeed contain a "Shetland mapping requirement":

(1) There is to be a Shetland mapping requirement.

(2) When publishing in any form a document that includes a map of Scotland, the Scottish Ministers, a local authority and any other Scottish public authority with mixed functions or no reserved functions must-

(a) comply with the Shetland mapping requirement, or

(b) where Ministers or, as the case may be, the authority consider that there are reasons not to comply, provide in such manner as they consider appropriate, information about those reasons.

(3) The Shetland mapping requirement is that, in any map of Scotland, the Shetland Islands must be displayed in a manner that accurately and proportionately represents their geographical location in relation to the rest of Scotland.

So this is not actually the flat prohibition it first appeared to be. If the listed authorities wish to publish a map of Scotland, they must either (1) make that map sufficiently ginormous to include the Shetlands without the need for a box, or (2) explain why they don't want to.

There don't appear to be any penalties for failing to do these things, nor are there any standards for how the explanation is to be provided-it can be "in such manner as they consider appropriate," which could be anything from a speech in Parliament to a rude little message written on the next map they publish. The Act generally requires the government to do more to consult with island communities before making changes that affect them significantly, though, so it's probably understood that this would entail some sort of notice-and-comment procedure.

The measure appears to have passed despite opposition from conservatives, or at least one Conservative Party member, who said "map specialists" (also known as "cartographers") had told him that upsizing a map for this reason would necessarily reduce the scale by about 40 percent. Losing that detail only to gain "a whole chunk of sea" would be counterproductive, he said.

The measure was supported, however, by ministers from the Orkney Islands, which are much closer to the mainland but apparently still sometimes relegated to second-class map treatment. "There have been a number of occasions that we have found ourselves bundled in a box and stuck in the Moray Firth," an Orkney MP said. (I don't think these people really have anything against the Moray Firth in particular, they just don't want to be misplaced.)

Possibly the most helpful aspect of the Islands (Scotland) Act 2018, however, is its definition of "island." An "island," it turns out, is "a naturally formed area of land which is (a) surrounded on all sides by the sea (ignoring artificial structures such as bridges), and (b) above water at high tide." I'm told there was a dispute over whether Skye is an "island" given that it's connected to the mainland by a bridge. Bridges are okay, but if you were planning on creating your own island in order to get special treatment, forget it.

loweringthebarfblike20.png googleplus20.png linkedin20.png pinterest20.png reddit20.png stumble20.png twitter20.png email20.png rss20.pngRelated Stories
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.feedblitz.com/loweringthebar
Feed Title Lowering the Bar
Feed Link https://www.loweringthebar.net/
Reply 0 comments