Anonymous Cow Herds Can't Vote (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on 2014-04-28 13:56 (#17K) Ugh, I didn't find that out until deliberating and making all my selections.:(Also, the 1 is most trusted, 8 is least trusted (but yield 8 and 1 point respectively) methodology could be made more clear.It's this kind of confusion that may have led to inaccurate voting results on another site recently. Re: Anonymous Cow Herds Can't Vote (Score: 1) by firstname.lastname@example.org on 2014-04-28 14:10 (#17P) The linked wikipedia article goes into great detail (with samples!) of how points are given. There is also a rather large "voting methods" section in wikipedia that give sample ballots of actual elections. I did find it odd that the name-vote from Soylent had the order swapped. In every ballot on wikipedia, "1" is always the highest priority. Re: Anonymous Cow Herds Can't Vote (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on 2014-04-28 14:28 (#17S) Right, but for what it's worth I do think it was a good idea of zafiro to remove the language about the points in the summary. 1 is 8 and 8 is one, just no. :)(These are the best damn (and most human-friendly) captchas I've ever seen. Was this your own idea?) Re: CAPCHA (Score: 2, Interesting) by email@example.com on 2014-04-28 19:19 (#183) Although I looked at a number of different CAPTCHA systems, including rolling my own, I ended up going with http://textcaptcha.com/It's simple to implement, accessible (blind people, etc), and much easier than reading a fuzzy/garbled image. :) Re: CAPCHA (Score: 1) by firstname.lastname@example.org on 2014-04-28 19:27 (#185) Nice. Seems like a good choice. Hopefully it doesn't become too popular; a look at the sample questions on their site made it seem pretty easy to break if someone devoted their attention to it.