Gah! (Score: 1) by firstname.lastname@example.org on 2014-05-05 04:59 (#1CC) There might be some good information buried in that Forbes article, but reading it is like trying to read someone Tweeting a novel. Re: Gah! (Score: 2, Insightful) by email@example.com on 2014-05-05 07:49 (#1CE) That Forbes article flows like honey compared to BBC News online article. By policy, every single sentence is a separate paragraph. This shows a disgusting disregard for all the principles of good writing that I was taught back when the UK had an education system that actually taught you something, and shows either the same disregard for the readers or is simply patronising to them.Anyway, back on topic, I think a lot of it is simply fashion. Is there any reason to think that facebook or twitter will follow a different-shaped popularity curve from myspace's from last decade? I can't pretend to be an expert in any of the individual social media platforms, as I've never been a member of any of them, never seeing them as just stupid flashes in the pan pandering to people who weren't using the internet back in the 1980, and the web in the early 90s, say, and who want strokes from as many different directions as possible. And like other fashions, when you see your kid brother wearing the same types of clothes as you, and listening to the same music, you cringe and find anything exclusive and new to differentiate yourself from the likes of him. So your next hang-out was a pub, rather than the multi-story carpark. The bottom line is that both actually smell of piss, but you're briefly happy while you're there with like-minded individuals. Of course, as seen in platforms closer to home, it's just as easy to get fed up of the platform by it changing under your feet. I stopped listening to some metal radio stations when all they played was industrial sequenced synth shit^W^W^Wmetal. There's little reason to think that the users have any more loyalty to the platforms than the platforms have respect for the users. So in some ways, it's a non-story, as it's so predictable.(Bryan: feature request - when looking at an prior post linked to from the mail messages, can it be given a "parent" link, and the option to see its whole subtree?)(And fuck beta!) Re: Gah! (Score: 2, Informative) by firstname.lastname@example.org on 2014-05-05 08:37 (#1CF) can it be given a "parent" link, and the option to see its whole subtree?Ya, I've been meaning to add that. Re: Gah! (Score: 1) by email@example.com on 2014-05-06 09:03 (#1E0) The comment preview now shows an abbreviated tree (the comment + it's direct decedents.)Click the story link for the full tree (obviously.) Re: Gah! (Score: 1) by firstname.lastname@example.org on 2014-05-07 13:18 (#1EZ) You're a dude, Bryan - many thanks!