Story
Microsoft vulnerability allows remote code execution via a malformed SSL packetPreview
History
2014-11-13 14:32
For the record, this is about CVE-2014-6321 (aka MS14-066) , which is different from CVE-2014-6332 (cf. http://m.theregister.co.uk/2014/11/12/driveby_unicorn_0day_beats_emet_affects_all_windows_versions)
I say this simply to avoid confusion, it seems that so far the news focused on CVE-2014-6332 (national news only talked about that one over here, especially the "19-year old bug" part) whereas CVE-2014-6321 went quite unnoticed.
I say this simply to avoid confusion, it seems that so far the news focused on CVE-2014-6332 (national news only talked about that one over here, especially the "19-year old bug" part) whereas CVE-2014-6321 went quite unnoticed.
2014-11-13 14:33
For the record, this is about CVE-2014-6321 (aka MS14-066) , which is different from CVE-2014-6332 (cf.aka href="https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms14-064" rel="nofollow">MS14-064)
I say this simply to avoid confusion, it seems that so far the news focused on CVE-2014-6332 (national news only talked about that one over here, especially the "19-year old bug" part) whereas CVE-2014-6321 went quite unnoticed.
href="http://m.theregister.co.uk/2014/11/12/driveby_unicorn_0day_beats_emet_affects_all_windows_versions" rel="nofollow">http://m.theregister.co.uk/2014/11/12/driveby_unicorn_0day_beats_emet_affects_all_windows_versions)
I say this simply to avoid confusion, it seems that so far the news focused on CVE-2014-6332 (national news only talked about that one over here, especially the "19-year old bug" part) whereas CVE-2014-6321 went quite unnoticed.
I say this simply to avoid confusion, it seems that so far the news focused on CVE-2014-6332 (national news only talked about that one over here, especially the "19-year old bug" part) whereas CVE-2014-6321 went quite unnoticed.
href="http://m.theregister.co.uk/2014/11/12/driveby_unicorn_0day_beats_emet_affects_all_windows_versions" rel="nofollow">http://m.theregister.co.uk/2014/11/12/driveby_unicorn_0day_beats_emet_affects_all_windows_versions
I say this simply to avoid confusion, it seems that so far the news focused on CVE-2014-6332 (national news only talked about that one over here, especially the "19-year old bug" part) whereas CVE-2014-6321 went quite unnoticed.
2014-11-13 14:35
For the record, this is about CVE-2014-6321 (aka MS14-066) , which is different from CVE-2014-6332 (aka MS14-064), both released last Patch Tuesday
I say this simply to avoid confusion, it seems that so far the news focused on CVE-2014-6332 (national news only talked about that one over here, especially the "19-year old bug" part) whereas CVE-2014-6321 went quite unnoticed.
http://m.theregister.co.uk/2014/11/12/driveby_unicorn_0day_beats_emet_affects_all_windows_versions
I say this simply to avoid confusion, it seems that so far the news focused on CVE-2014-6332 (national news only talked about that one over here, especially the "19-year old bug" part) whereas CVE-2014-6321 went quite unnoticed.
http://m.theregister.co.uk/2014/11/12/driveby_unicorn_0day_beats_emet_affects_all_windows_versions
Junk Status
Not marked as junk