StoryGrsecurity stops issuing public patches, citing trademark abuse
From my understanding, I'd be of the opinion that GR sec can distribute to whomever they want, as long as the provide the source code. One of their sponsors could theoretically take the code, strip out the trademarked name and re-distribute it like centos ( well, before rh bought centos) . Are you saying that they will distribute as a binary kernel module or something? I wouldn't have thought that was possible. In any case, if they do that, then they can't access the GPL_ONLY functions.
Not marked as junk