Spotting Bad Science

by
Anonymous Coward
in science on (#3J9)
story imageCompound Interest , a chemistry blog, has posted an infographic guide to spotting bad science. Among the listed things to watch out for are perennial favorites "Correlation & Causation" and "Sample Size Too Small".

The author was inspired to create the guide after running into so many of these gotchas while doing online research for a different article. It is in no way intended to be comprehensive, but instead to act as a brief reminder of what things to be alert for when reading science news articles and research results.

Guides like this might be overly simple for the readership of a site like Pipedot, but I personally find them useful as refreshers, much as I do the excellent TechNyou video series "Critical Thinking" and "This Thing Called Science" which, though aimed at high-schoolers and below, are still a good foundational resource. Then again, I like bright colors and shiny objects.

Re: Correlation, causation, and all that. (Score: 2, Funny)

by danieldvorkin@pipedot.org on 2014-04-27 15:17 (#16S)

Or less gently, as my Slashdot .sig used to say, "The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using 'correlation is not causation' as an argument is close to 1."
Post Comment
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Which of seventy one, forty five, 53, 96, 47 or ninety three is the largest?