Article 3RV8S Machines that suck COâ‚‚ from the air might be cheaper than we thought

Machines that suck COâ‚‚ from the air might be cheaper than we thought

by
Scott K. Johnson
from Ars Technica - All content on (#3RV8S)
ce_pilot2-800x571.jpg

Enlarge / Carbon Engineering's pilot plant, which captures CO2 from the atmosphere. (credit: Stephen Hui, Pembina Institute)

When you spill a drink, you don't say, "Oh well, the only thing we can do is spill fewer drinks in the future." You grab a towel. So there's also a natural attraction to the idea that we should develop a towel that can remove CO2 from the atmosphere. That isn't as simple as grabbing one from a Home Goods store, however, and cost estimates have not fueled optimism for most methods of doing this.

Reforestation is an obvious option, but its potential impact is probably smaller than you think. Other biological schemes could include growing biofuels to burn in power plants that capture emissions and store them underground. Recently, we've also seen a couple of working pilot projects that look like a power plant run in reverse-they suck in air and harvest concentrated CO2, ready for storage.

One of those plants, located an hour north of Vancouver, British Columbia, is the brainchild of a company called Carbon Engineering. One of the founders of Carbon Engineering is Harvard's David Keith, a researcher studying this and other conceivable methods of "geoengineering" our planet's climate. This week, the Carbon Engineering team has published a nuts-and-bolts breakdown of its design, providing the first cost analysis of a working carbon capture plant.

Read 13 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=2k0hxZbFLKk:xBqUCac-Ox4:V_sGLiPB index?i=2k0hxZbFLKk:xBqUCac-Ox4:F7zBnMyn index?d=qj6IDK7rITs index?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/index
Feed Title Ars Technica - All content
Feed Link https://arstechnica.com/
Reply 0 comments