Not for the first time (Score: 1) by kwerle@pipedot.org on 2016-02-14 01:57 (#13WRJ) It's worth noting that the article, itself, says this isn't the first time. I mention this because the first sentence of the summary kinda implies that it was. Re: Not for the first time (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on 2016-02-15 05:29 (#13ZHK) No doubt this couple was surprised
Re: Not for the first time (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on 2016-02-15 05:29 (#13ZHK) No doubt this couple was surprised