Pipedot Needs People! (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on 2014-04-24 14:25 (#15N) It's such a shame that Soylent (horrible name) has so much more activity than Pipedot.This site has better editorial control, a much better appearance, better article selection, and even seems to load faster.I don't know if a Pipedot/Soylent merge is one of the choices in the Soylent name poll, but it damn well should be.From my point of view the only big mistake Pipedot initially made was banning anonymous posters, but you seem to have fixed that.In any case, no matter what happens, thank you for making such a strong effort! Re: Pipedot Needs People! (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on 2014-04-24 21:37 (#15R) Damn, even the URLs are better here! Instead of descriptive article names, Soylent's got datestamped numeric article numbers. Like 1995 all over again!
Re: Pipedot Needs People! (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on 2014-04-24 21:37 (#15R) Damn, even the URLs are better here! Instead of descriptive article names, Soylent's got datestamped numeric article numbers. Like 1995 all over again!