Pipedot Needs People! (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on 2014-04-24 14:25 (#15N) It's such a shame that Soylent (horrible name) has so much more activity than Pipedot.This site has better editorial control, a much better appearance, better article selection, and even seems to load faster.I don't know if a Pipedot/Soylent merge is one of the choices in the Soylent name poll, but it damn well should be.From my point of view the only big mistake Pipedot initially made was banning anonymous posters, but you seem to have fixed that.In any case, no matter what happens, thank you for making such a strong effort! Re: Pipedot Needs People! (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on 2014-04-24 22:27 (#15S) A big problem I've noticed is Pipedot has very few articles posted. Start posting more articles and there will be more to discuss. With more to discuss, more folks will start coming, as I agree that this site is technically better than the other ones. Unfortunately, that technical "betterness" means nothing if you don't have the content.
Re: Pipedot Needs People! (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on 2014-04-24 22:27 (#15S) A big problem I've noticed is Pipedot has very few articles posted. Start posting more articles and there will be more to discuss. With more to discuss, more folks will start coming, as I agree that this site is technically better than the other ones. Unfortunately, that technical "betterness" means nothing if you don't have the content.