Re: Infowars Links = Bye Bye, Pipedot

Infowars Links = Bye Bye, Pipedot (Score: 2, Insightful)

by Anonymous Coward on 2014-05-20 13:43 (#1SH)

That's two Infowars links in the same day, guys. Are you trying to turn away what little intelligent traffic we're getting here?

I really like it here, but if this is going to be a conspiracy site I'm not going to stick around.

Re: Infowars Links = Bye Bye, Pipedot (Score: 1)

by lhsi@pipedot.org on 2014-05-20 14:13 (#1SP)

The link in the summary doesn't work as it has put a ] on the end.

Re: Infowars Links = Bye Bye, Pipedot (Score: 0)

by Anonymous Coward on 2014-05-20 14:16 (#1SQ)

No, no, I meant this was the second such link after the preceding Intel VPro article, which was built around Infowars crapola.

Re: Infowars Links = Bye Bye, Pipedot (Score: 2, Insightful)

by zafiro17@pipedot.org on 2014-05-20 16:19 (#1ST)

Editor here: your point is well taken. I paused, but thought it would be worse to not submit a link an author had taken the time to post to the pipeline. Hopefully, when we get more submissions coming in this will be less of an issue. I too would like this to not be a site that simply mirrors the infowars site (or any other site, for that matter). But today, that's what the pipeline mailman carried in.

Would love some of your article proposals, by the way - we're trying to publish just about everything that comes in that is serious.

Story

Preview