Conviction Overturned In Case Of Rutgers Student Whose Roommate Committed Suicide After Being Secretly Filmed
As we noted, Ravi filming Clementi was definitely creepy, immature and dumb. But criminal? If Ravi had just filmed Clementi and nothing happened, there never would have been a prosecution. Ravi was really being prosecuted because Clementi killed himself -- and that's problematic. As we've explained a few times, while there's an obvious emotional reaction to someone killing themselves, no one fully knows why they did it other than the individuals themselves. And, blaming others for mean things they may have done after someone commits suicide is a really dangerous place to go. It actually encourages suicide by letting people think that killing themselves will "punish" those who are tormenting them. But the biggest thing is that we shouldn't blame one person based on the actions of another.
It only took four and a half years, but Ravi's conviction has now been overturned by an appeals court. You can read the full opinion here.
After Ravi's conviction in 2012, the state Supreme Court in a separate case struck down part of the state's bias crime statute that focused on the victim's state of mind. According to that case, it is the defendant's state of mind and intent that is important, not the victim's.Of course, this isn't over yet. The court ordered a new trial, claiming that the original one was biased -- and there's still a chance that prosecutors may appeal this ruling to the New Jersey Supreme Court.
The appellate court said the prosecution conceded in its oral arguments four of Ravi's bias convictions should "be void as a matter of law," and, accordingly, dismissed those charges with prejudice. The court also dismissed Ravi's conviction on hindering his own apprehension and tampering with witnesses.
As for the reasoning of the court, it pointed out that prosecutors basically focused on Clementi's actions, rather than the defendant's (Ravi's), and presented an unfair and biased picture to the jury:
After carefully reviewing the record developed at trial, itis clear that the evidence the State presented to prove the biasintimidation charges under N.J.S.A. 2C:16-1(a)(3) permeated theentire case against defendant, rendering any attempt to salvagethe convictions under the remaining charges futile. The Stateused evidence revealing the victim's reserved demeanor andexpressions of shame and humiliation as a counterweight todefendant's cavalier indifference and unabashed insensitivity tohis roommate's right to privacy and dignity. The prosecutoraggressively pressed this point to the jury in her eloquentclosing argument.In other words, exactly as we've talked about for years: when you go after someone because someone else committed suicide, the emotional aspects of the case are likely to completely steamroll the legal issues. Thankfully, the court has finally recognized that, even if only four years too late.
It is unreasonable to expect a rational juror to remainunaffected by this evidence. In light of the Court's ruling inPomianek, admission of T.C.'s state of mind evidence constitutedan error "of such a nature to have been clearly capable ofproducing an unjust result."
None of that is to suggest that what Ravi did was right, or that Clementi's suicide wasn't tragic. Ravi did something really stupid and immature. But stupid and immature doesn't mean criminal. Hopefully the prosecutors just decide to cut their losses and drop the case altogether.
Permalink | Comments | Email This Story