Comment 2S7X Here's the good quote

Story

Paul Venezia asks: what if we split Linux into desktop and server versions?

Preview

Here's the good quote (Score: 1)

by zafiro17@pipedot.org on 2014-09-10 13:06 (#2S7X)

There is enough pushback to systemd to warrant a fork of a major distribution that excises systemd and the GNOME dependencies, while providing a more traditional and stable server platform that has no hint of desktop support. No time need be wasted managing the hundreds upon hundreds of desktop packages present in the distro tree, no need to include massive numbers of desktop peripheral and graphical drivers (RHEL 6.3 ships with 57 xorg drivers, for instance).

There's also the matter of security. The security concerns for a desktop are vastly different than those for a server -- and server security concerns are vastly different among servers, depending on what each server is doing. However, it's safe to say that protecting against malware delivered by clicking through a malicious Web page is not high on the list of possible threats for a Memcached server.

Junk Status

Not marked as junk