Fracking protest injunction based on 'flimsy evidence'
by Rob Evans from Environment | The Guardian on (#36Q8N)
Ineos exaggerated the threat posed by protesters to justify its temporary legal action, court hears
A multinational firm has been accused of using "flimsy and exaggerated" evidence when it obtained an "astonishingly broad" injunction against all anti-fracking protesters, a court has heard.
Petrochemicals giant Ineos is seeking to enforce a sweeping injunction to prevent any protester from obstructing its fracking operations. Campaigners face being jailed, fined or having their assets seized if they break the injunction.
Continue reading...