A Young Ian McKellen Elegantly Explains the Difference Between Stage and Film Acting to Dick Cavett in 1981
In a wonderfully honest interview from 1981, a young, dark-haired Ian McKellen elegantly explained to talk show host Dick Cavett the difference between acting for stage and acting for film. McKellen specifically focused on body movements, stating that the distance between the stage and the audience requires more extreme positioning than up-close cameras. Additionally, the camera can show the audience where to look, whereas onstage, that directional focus is missing.
Related Laughing Squid PostsSir Ian McKellen Channels Gandalf From 'The Lord of The Rings' While Giving Exam Advice to British StudentsJim Meskimen and Ross Marquand aka 'The Impression Guys' Demonstrate Their Vocal ProwessAlfred Hitchcock Tells Dick Cavett About the First Time His Mother Scared Him In a 1972 InterviewThe trouble about the stage is that the audience sees the whole body. They are far enough away from it, even in a small theater, to take it all in and of course they because they're not engaged in the action of the play. They are there only to be an audience who listen and indeed a spectator who watches. They can take it all in with an objectivity which normally they don't apply "the crucial difference that the camera is very like somebody just in the room with you. It concentrates very partially on you, usually on the face, and the body can be doing what it wants.
Follow Laughing Squid on Facebook, Twitter, Flipboard and Subscribe by Email.
The post A Young Ian McKellen Elegantly Explains the Difference Between Stage and Film Acting to Dick Cavett in 1981 first appeared on Laughing Squid.