How the UK electronics industry lost its spark | Letters

Blame for the fall of GEC rests with its boss, Arnold Weinstock, says Tim Webb. Plus letters on the collapse of a once-great British electronics sector from Roger Cooper, Michael Prior, Alan Burkitt-Gray and David Murray

Aditya Chakrabortty is basically correct in his analysis of the decline of Britain's electronics industry and the central role played by Arnold Weinstock, head of GEC (Why does Britain need Huawei? The answer speaks volumes, 8 May). Weinstock was indeed parsimonious; he paid poor salaries, engineers worked in portable buildings and redundancy payments were the lowest the law would allow. In my job as a trade union official, I found him inflexible and uncompromising. Chakrabortty gives him a little too much credit for maintaining a level of research and development that was abandoned by his successors.

While his foreign competitors were selling innovative consumer electronics and products people wanted to buy, Weinstock decided it was safer to build huge cash mountains rather than invest in the civil sector. He concentrated on military production, a source of easy money, provided by his friends in the Ministry of Defence and funded by the British taxpayer. Many of these products were overpriced, delivered late and performed poorly, particularly in the field of radar.

Continue reading...