Comment 4GAXV Re: Story submission: Eric S. Raymond: [GPL]"revokists" have it right.

Pipe

Submissions closed

Preview

Story submission: Eric S. Raymond: [GPL]"revokists" have it right. (Score: 0)

by Anonymous Coward on 2019-06-02 06:08 (#4GAXT)

Eric S. Raymond: [GPL]"revokists" have it right.

http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=8317#comment-2238862 (Archive link: http://archive.fo/emkVd )
A commentator asked on Eric S. Raymond's website:

>ESR: Eben Moglen suggested that he was going to write a paper refuting the notion that "The GPL is revocable":
>
>>I think the best procedure would be for me to publish my analysis and
>>for you then to tell me what is wrong with it.
>https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/26/718
>
>Why has no such paper from him materialized?

ESR response was shocking, blunt, and to the point:
>esr on 2019-05-30 at 08:08:23 said:
>
>>Why has no such paper from him materialized?
>
>Because Moglen is either wrong about or deliberately misrepresenting the law and the "revokists" have it right. Thank you, I had already figured this out from his (non)responses on lkml.

Re: Story submission: Eric S. Raymond: [GPL]"revokists" have it right. (Score: 0)

by Anonymous Coward on 2019-06-02 06:10 (#4GAXV)

esr on 2019-05-31 at 08:44:49 said:

>Again, if the revokists have it right, I don't think you'll like how that will actually play out.

Maybe I won't, but the law is what it is. We can't solve any problem by denying that reality.

Junk Status

Marked as [Not Junk] by evilviper@pipedot.org on 2020-12-26 05:13