/run & /var/run being a tmpfs
by lonestar_italy from LinuxQuestions.org on (#4ZEDH)
Hello,
Speaking of a recent change in current,
are we sure that having /run and now also /var/run, because it's a bind mount, as tmpfs is fine?
I've already found issues with services that do not recreate a folder in /var/run at startup because they expect it to be permanent, and so they don't start.
Is it the services that should be fixed or the directory that should be made not a tmpfs?
Speaking of a recent change in current,
are we sure that having /run and now also /var/run, because it's a bind mount, as tmpfs is fine?
I've already found issues with services that do not recreate a folder in /var/run at startup because they expect it to be permanent, and so they don't start.
Is it the services that should be fixed or the directory that should be made not a tmpfs?