Article 571JS Judge ordered critics of cop not to name him while he sues them, but now he's named by USA Today, the biggest English newspaper in the world.

Judge ordered critics of cop not to name him while he sues them, but now he's named by USA Today, the biggest English newspaper in the world.

by
Rob Beschizza
from on (#571JS)

A cop allegedly flashed the "OK" sign, appropriated lately as plausibly-deniable symbol by white supremacists and right-wing provocateurs, at protestors. This does not mean the officer, named as Ryan Olthaus in an official complaint, is either of those things, and he is suing several bloggers who suggested that he is. In addition to this, however, the judge in his case issued a restraining order that prevents the people he is suing from talking about him at all. This is blatantly unconstutitional, writes Eugene Volokh for Reason magazine.

The bloggers are banned from mentioning the police officer at all. They aren't just banned from libeling him; even a post conveying accurate information, or expressing an opinion, about the police officer is forbidden, if it mentions the officer's name.

That strikes me as a clearly unconstitutional prior restraint. ... all this strikes me as quite improper: the sealing (even in the more limited form than first appeared), the restraining order, and the proposed injunction. But at this point, the restraining order appears to be the most troubling: It bars critics of the government from mentioning the name of a public official (Ohio law treats police officers as public officials for libel law purposes and for other purposes), based on a quick decision by one judge without an adversary hearing. A pretty clear First Amendment violation, it seems to me.

Legal efforts to conceal the officer's name have resulted in his being widely-named in the media, including in USA Today, the largest-circulation newspaper in the English-speaking world: a textbook example of the Streisand Effect, whereby efforts to silence something only draws wide attention to it.

His facebook wall is a wild stream of right-wing anti-Antifa propaganda, anti-BLM sentiment, white victimhood, and other violent fantasies. A lot of his content is flagged by facebook fact-checking algorithm as false.https://t.co/8BAaTV669e pic.twitter.com/MtYetMgvVE

- friends of Bones (@FriendsofBones) June 25, 2020

At Techdirt, Tim Cushing reports that the social media presence identified as Olthaus's is gone, but not before being screencapped by activists. What they report reads like a The Onion parody of an angry cop's Facebook page, consumed by fear, violent fantasy and tacky right-wing memes. There's even a Punisher skull with a Thin Blue Line flag.

Officer Ryan Olthaus - who was involved in the controversial killing of Dontez O'Neal in 2012 - goes by the name "Michael Ryan" on his Facebook page. The pseudonym being used in the lawsuit against these social media users is "M.R."

That all seems to add up to Officer Pseudonym. His lawyer seems to feel the current, possibly unconstitutional order doesn't go far enough, though. The officer would also like to see the defendants forced to remove any previous posts about him. His attorney argues the posts are libelous because [checks filing] they were made by people who don't like cops.

External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location https://boingboing.net/feed
Feed Title
Feed Link https://boingboing.net/
Reply 0 comments