Article 594Q6 UK Covid live: Andy Burnham says England's north must not be 'sacrificial lamb' for flawed No 10 lockdown policy

UK Covid live: Andy Burnham says England's north must not be 'sacrificial lamb' for flawed No 10 lockdown policy

by
Andrew Sparrow
from on (#594Q6)

UK records 18,980 more cases, with English hospital admissions up 15% in a day; Barrow-in-Furness, York, north-east Derbyshire, Erewash and Chesterfield move into tier 2 alongside London, Essex and Elmbridge

6.21pm BST

1/3 Disappointed by the #EUCO conclusions on UK/EU negotiations. Surprised EU is no longer committed to working "intensively" to reach a future partnership as agreed with @vonderleyen on 3 October.

2/3 Also surprised by suggestion that to get an agreement all future moves must come from UK. It's an unusual approach to conducting a negotiation.

3/3 PM @BorisJohnson will set out UK reactions and approach tomorrow in the light of his statement of 7 September.

Related: Coronavirus live news: warning Europe death rate could reach five times April peak; Von der Leyen self-isolating

6.03pm BST

In the Commons Matt Hancock, the health secretary, had to defend the performance of NHS Test and Trace in response to repeated complaints about it from MPs. They have been infuriated by revelations that some consultants working on it have been paid as much as 6,250, despite the fact it's not meeting its targets. A document from the government's Scientific Advisory Committee for Emergencies published on Monday said test and trace was only having a marginal impact" on reducing the spread of the virus.

Hancock stressed that the weekly performance figures published today (pdf) showed improvement or positive developments in some areas. And there are some pluses in the 45-page document. But, overall, it shows that the service is still failing to meet its key targets.

Continue reading...
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.theguardian.com/theguardian/world/rss
Feed Title
Feed Link http://feeds.theguardian.com/
Reply 0 comments