Article 5B3T7 Equity Shot: Salesforce’s $27.7 billion-dollar Slack message

Equity Shot: Salesforce’s $27.7 billion-dollar Slack message

by
Natasha Mascarenhas
from Crunch Hype on (#5B3T7)

Hello and welcome back to Equity, TechCrunch's venture capital-focused podcast where we unpack the numbers behind the headlines.

Welcome to an Equity Shot all about the huge, and hugely interesting, Salesforce -Slack deal, in which the enterprise social company will be subsumed for the mere price of $27.7 billion.

TechCrunch has notes on the deal here, and on what Salesforce expects the acquisition will do for its growth rate here.

Salesforce buys Slack in a $27.7B megadeal

Some of the drama, we admit, was removed when the deal was presaged several days ago, but that didn't stop the Equity crew from having a lot to say on the matter. Here are some of the topics we discuss:

  • How big is this deal, both literally and figuratively?
  • We talk about the market reception and if the rumors correctly valued the deal
  • Does Slack deserve snaps or just a simple pat on the back?
  • What does the deal tell us about vertical SaaS tools?
  • The COVID-19 effect on remote tools
  • What does SoftBank have to do with this (and why does SoftBank always have something to do with everything)?
  • And whole lot of conversation and discussion on Microsoft and its competitor

Salesforce beats growth expectations as investors digest the Slack acquisition

We are back in two days' time, so don't wander too far. Chat soon!

Equity drops every Monday at 7:00 a.m. PST and Thursday afternoon as fast as we can get it out, so subscribe to us onApple Podcasts,Overcast,Spotifyand all the casts.

Techcrunch?d=2mJPEYqXBVI Techcrunch?d=7Q72WNTAKBA Techcrunch?d=yIl2AUoC8zA Techcrunch?i=CTUyYs8Y6P4:twdKJz7xrqQ:-BT Techcrunch?i=CTUyYs8Y6P4:twdKJz7xrqQ:D7D Techcrunch?d=qj6IDK7rITsCTUyYs8Y6P4
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.feedburner.com/TechCrunch/
Feed Title Crunch Hype
Feed Link https://techncruncher.blogspot.com/
Reply 0 comments