Article 5G440 slackpkg slackware64 packages masked but in changelog.txt

slackpkg slackware64 packages masked but in changelog.txt

by
linux91
from LinuxQuestions.org on (#5G440)
'slackpkg upgrade-all' shows packages that are available for upgrade, such as glibc, but are not installed. glibc appears in the base install repository file tree.
When 'slackpkg search glibc' is run the following is returned:

[inst] multilib : aaa_glibc-solibs-2.33_multilib-x86_64-1alien
[inst] multilib : glibc-2.33_multilib-x86_64-1alien
[inst] multilib : glibc-i18n-2.33_multilib-x86_64-1alien
[inst] multilib : glibc-profile-2.33_multilib-x86_64-1alien
[inst] slackware64 : glibc-zoneinfo-2021a-noarch-1
[mask] slackware64 : aaa_glibc-solibs-2.33-x86_64-2
[mask] slackware64 : glibc-2.33-x86_64-2
[mask] slackware64 : glibc-i18n-2.33-x86_64-2
[mask] slackware64 : glibc-profile-2.33-x86_64-2

I cannot remember why or how they were masked.
I seem to remember ferreting this out before, but can't find the reason.
Should the following packages be installed?:
Thu Apr 1 23:50:48 UTC 2021
a/aaa_glibc-solibs-2.33-x86_64-2.txz: Rebuilt.
ap/inxi-20210329_a539c8fd-noarch-1.txz: Upgraded.
l/glibc-2.33-x86_64-2.txz: Rebuilt.
l/glibc-i18n-2.33-x86_64-2.txz: Rebuilt.
l/glibc-profile-2.33-x86_64-2.txz: Rebuilt.
If they are, I am also trying to understand how they got masked.latest?d=yIl2AUoC8zA latest?i=yvAnlRcDX88:zVKtKfadwnw:F7zBnMy latest?i=yvAnlRcDX88:zVKtKfadwnw:V_sGLiP latest?d=qj6IDK7rITs latest?i=yvAnlRcDX88:zVKtKfadwnw:gIN9vFwyvAnlRcDX88
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location https://feeds.feedburner.com/linuxquestions/latest
Feed Title LinuxQuestions.org
Feed Link https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/
Reply 0 comments