Article 5T6GC Complex Conjugates versus Quaternion Conjugates

Complex Conjugates versus Quaternion Conjugates

by
John
from John D. Cook on (#5T6GC)

The conjugate of a complex number

qconj1.svg

is the complex number

qconj2.svg

Taking the conjugate flips over a complex number, taking its reflection in the real axis.

Multiplication stretches and rotates complex numbers, and addition translates complex numbers. You can't flip the complex plane over by any series of dilatations, rotations, and translations.

The situation is different for quaternions. The conjugate of a quaternion

qconj3.svg

is

qconj4.svg

You can flip four dimensional space over by a series of dilations, rotations, and translations. Namely

qconj55.svg

To prove this equation, let's first see what happens when you multiply q on both sides by i:

qconj6.svg

That is, the effect of multiplying on both sides by i is to flip the sign of the real component and the i component.

Multiplying on both sizes by j or k works analogously: it flips the sign of the real component and its component, and leaves the other two alone.

It follows that

qconj7.svg

and so the result follows from dividing by -2.

Update: There's an analogous theorem for octonions.

More on quaternionsThe post Complex Conjugates versus Quaternion Conjugates first appeared on John D. Cook.
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheEndeavour?format=xml
Feed Title John D. Cook
Feed Link https://www.johndcook.com/blog
Reply 0 comments