Are ‘Fast Movies’ Really A Substitute For The Real Thing? Or Just Good Marketing?
There's an interesting post on the TorrentFreak blog about fast movies:
These heavily edited copies of mainstream movies aim to summarize key plot lines via voice-over narration in about 10 minutes. While no replacement for the real thing, these edits accumulated millions of views and incurred the wrath of rightsholders, leading to the arrest of three people in Japan.
As that rightly points out, fast movies are not a substitute for watching the entire film. An earlier report on the same Web site indicates that the Japanese film industry disagrees:
the losses cited by rightsholders are huge - 95 billion yen (US$ 856.7m) in the past 12 months alone, roughly $10 per fast movie' view when working in the 80 million views cited by CODA [a Japanese anti-piracy organisation].
This seems to be the classic lost sales" fallacy - that every unauthorized copy of a work represents a $10 sale that didn't happen. That's unrealistic: many people browse movie clips online out of curiosity, and never had any intention of paying to watch the entire film. As the US District Judge James P. Jones wrote in a criminal copyright case in 2008, reported by Ars Technica:
Those who download movies and music for free would not necessarily purchase those movies and music at the full purchase price. [A]lthough it is true that someone who copies a digital version of a sound recording has little incentive to purchase the recording through legitimate means, it does not necessarily follow that the downloader would have made a legitimate purchase if the recording had not been available for free.
There's another important angle, missing even from the judge's wise words. The lost sales" view completely overlooks the gained sales" that also result from people discovering new titles in these ways. They may use the latter as a taster, and then go on to make a purchase that they had not originally been planning. That seems likely to happen in the case of the fast movies", since they are not only much shorter than the original, they typically have only a voice-over instead of the full audio track.
For a film that is worth watching, the fast movie" versions act as excellent marketing material. Rather than suing the people who make these kind of trailers, maybe the Japanese film industry should support them.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter, Diaspora, or Mastodon. Originally posted to Walled Culture.