The Vardy Effect: Going to court to deny something a rock could see is true

Rebekah Vardy probably isn't buzzing at the ruling, a character assassination that has left her well and truly stung by libel

Oscar Wilde, Barbra Streisand, and now - Rebekah Vardy. When news broke that Vardy had lost her libel case against Coleen Rooney, she joined this heady roster of celebrities who have launched brain-bogglingly misguided and self-wounding legal cases. Like Wilde - who sued the Marquess of Queensberry for revealing his homosexuality - Vardy went to court to deny something that a rock could see was true: she'd passed on private stories about Rooney to the press. And like Streisand - who sued a website for featuring an image of her house, thereby drawing the world's attention to it - she believed going to court was the best way to control her image. She was wrong.

Vardy traded private details of her husband's colleagues and their wives in the hope of currying positive coverage in the media. And because of that, Mrs Justice Steyn delivered a verdict that was even more of a character assassination than Vardy's own memorable description of Rooney to a Daily Mail journalist: Arguing with Coleen Rooney would be as pointless as arguing with a pigeon: you can tell it that you are right and it is wrong, but it's still going to shit in your hair." Well, Rebekah, you're covered in shit now.