Article 6EHTF Tinyproxy or Squid-cache?

Tinyproxy or Squid-cache?

by
Jason.nix
from LinuxQuestions.org on (#6EHTF)
Hello,
Is Tinyproxy or Squid-cache safer?
Written on Tinyproxy's website:
Quote:
Tinyproxy has a small footprint and requires very little in the way of system resources. The memory footprint tends to be around 2 MB with glibc, and the CPU load increases linearly with the number of simultaneous connections (depending on the speed of the connection).
Please share your experiences.

Thank you.
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location https://feeds.feedburner.com/linuxquestions/latest
Feed Title LinuxQuestions.org
Feed Link https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/
Reply 0 comments