The brave victims of Russell Brand’s misogyny deserve full support. This time, let’s get it right | Marina Hyde

The new claims made me think about the media's treatment of the woman he so famously humiliated on Radio 2. I hope we all know better now

Contemplating the notion of crossing the line, Russell Brand once remarked: As I always say, there is no line. People draw that line in afterwards to fuck you up." Anyway: here we all are in the afterwards.

Back in the day, though, a lot of people were thrilled to be on what they thought was Russell's side of the line. For a certain type of mournfully uncool man on the left, Russell Brand was quite the excitement. You only had to watch their little faces in his presence - lit up at being fleetingly indulged by the kind of guy who would probably have bullied them at school. He was a sports columnist at the Guardian (often also writing opinion columns), he guest-edited the New Statesman, while the apogee of this particular stage of Brand's inevitable journey toward alt-right-frotting wingnut was surely the ludicrously feverish speculation over whether he'd endorse Labour in the 2015 general election. Keen to be awarded his royal warrant, the then Labour leader, Ed Miliband, traipsed to Brand's London flat during the final stages of the campaign, for a filmed interview where committed non-voter Russell inquired rhetorically: Since suffrage, since the right to vote, what has meaningfully occurred?" Nothing much, he reckoned. Somehow, this disqualifyingly moronic assumption did not deter his political acolytes.