Article 6F1XF Do Liverpool have the strength to take on champions who never have an off-day? | Jonathan Wilson

Do Liverpool have the strength to take on champions who never have an off-day? | Jonathan Wilson

by
Jonathan Wilson
from US news | The Guardian on (#6F1XF)

The early weeks of the season have seen high-quality teams rise to the top of the Premier League. The only problem: they face Manchester City

Imagine what a title race this could be, if only Manchester City didn't exist. On Sunday, Arsenal and Tottenham played out a thrilling and high-quality 2-2 draw; both have dropped only four points this season. Brighton are averaging three goals a game and have dropped just three points in six games. And as Manchester United and Chelsea struggle - because at least one big team has to be in crisis to offer a sense of light and shade - Sunday's win over West Ham would have carried Liverpool top of the table having won five in a row, as their midfield rebuild begins to mesh with the rejuvenated forward line.

But City do exist and their excellence means Liverpool are only second. City have won five of the last six league titles and with each passing week it becomes increasingly likely they'll make that six out of seven. And while much will - rightly - be made of their ownership, and of the 115 charges they face relating to alleged breaches of the Premier League's financial regulations as they built to this position of strength, they are also an extraordinary football team.

This is an extract from Soccer With Jonathan Wilson, a weekly look from the Guardian US at the game in Europe and beyond. Subscribe for free here. Have a question for Jonathan? Email soccerwithjw@theguardian.com, and he'll answer the best in a future edition

Continue reading...
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/rss
Feed Title US news | The Guardian
Feed Link https://www.theguardian.com/us-news
Feed Copyright Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. 2024
Reply 0 comments