Article 6GQFN Solving a triangle the size of Argentina

Solving a triangle the size of Argentina

by
John
from John D. Cook on (#6GQFN)

The numbers in today's date-11, 28, and 23-make up the sides of a triangle. This doesn't always happen; the two smaller numbers have to add up to more than the larger number.

We'll look at triangles with sides 11, 23, and 28 in the plane, on a sphere, and on a hypersphere. Most of the post will be devoted to the middle case, a large triangle on the surface of the earth.

Solving a triangle in the plane

If we draw a triangle with sides 11, 23, and 28, we can find out the angles of the triangle using the law of cosines:

c^2 = a^2 + b^2 - 2ab cos C

where C is the angle opposite the side c. We can find each of the angles of the triangle by rotating which side we call c.

If we let c = 11, then C = arccos((23^2 + 28^2 - 11^2)/(2 * 23 * 28)) = 22.26.

If we let c = 23, then C = arccos((11^2 + 28^2 - 23^2)/(2 * 11 * 28)) = 52.38.

If we let c = 28, then C = arccos((11^2 + 23^2 - 28^2)/(2 * 11 * 23)) = 105.36.

Solving a triangle on a sphere

Now suppose we make our 11-23-28 triangle very large, drawing our triangle on the face of the earth. We pick our unit of measurement to be 100 miles, and we get a triangle very roughly the size and shape of Argentina.

We can still use the law of cosines, but it takes a different form, and the meaning of the terms changes. The law of cosines on a sphere is

cos(c) = cos(a) cos(b) + sin(a) sin(b) cos(C).

As before, a, b, and c are sides of the triangle, and the sides b and c intersect at an angle C. However, now the sides themselves are angles because they are arcs on a sphere. Now a, b, and c are measured in degrees or radians, not in miles.

If the length of an arc is x, the angular measure of the arc is 2x/R where R is the radius of the sphere. The mean radius of the earth is 3959 miles, and we'll assume the earth is a sphere with that radius.

We can solve for the angle opposite the longest side by using

C = arccos( (cos(c) - cos(a) cos(b)) / sin(a) sin(b) )

where

a = 2 * 1100 / 3959
b = 2 * 2300 / 3959
c = 2 * 2800 / 3959

It turns out thatC = 149.8160, and the other angles are 14.3977 and 29.4896.

Importantly, the sum of these three angles is more than 180. In fact it's 193.7033.

The sum of the vertex angles in a spherical triangle is always more than 180, and the bigger the triangle, the more the sum exceeds 180. The amount by which the sum exceeds 180 is called the spherical excess E and it is proportional to the area. In radians,

E = area / R^2.

In our example the excess is 13.7033 and so the area of our triangle is

13.7033 * ( radians / 180) * 3959^2 miles^2 = 3,749,000 miles^2.

Now Argentina has an area of about a million square miles, so our triangle is bigger than Argentina, but smaller than South America (6.8 million square miles). Argentina is about 2300 miles from north to south, so one of the sides of our triangle matches Argentina well.

Note that there are no similar triangles on a sphere: if you change the lengths of the sides proportionately, you change the vertex angles.

Solving a triangle on a pseudosphere

In a hyperbolic space, such as the surface of a pseudosphere, a surface that looks sorta like the bell of a trombone, the law of cosines becomes

cosh(c) = cosh(a) cosh(b) + sinh(a) sinh(b) cos(C)

where < 0 is the curvature of the space. Note that if we set = 1 and delete all the hs this would become the law of cosines on a sphere.

Just as the sum of the angles in a triangle add up to more than 180 on a sphere, and exactly 180 in a plane, they add up to less than 180 on a pseudosphere. I suppose you could call the difference between 180 and the sum of the vertex angles the spherical deficiency by analogy with spherical excess, but I don't recall hearing that term used.

Related postsThe post Solving a triangle the size of Argentina first appeared on John D. Cook.
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheEndeavour?format=xml
Feed Title John D. Cook
Feed Link https://www.johndcook.com/blog
Reply 0 comments