Why is alleged predator Bill Clinton still welcome in the Democratic party? | Moira Donegan

Democratic elites continue to ignore the multiple allegations against Clinton - and the reality of the Lewinsky affair

One of the grim lessons of the #MeToo movement and its long backlash is this: whether someone finds a sexual abuse allegation credible largely depends on their pre-existing opinion of the man accused. When a woman comes forward with an account of a man's mistreatment of her - be it humiliating boorishness, violent rape or any of the range of degradations and hurts that fall along the wide spectrum between - the listener's response is fairly predictable. If they hate the accused man, they'll believe his accuser. If they like him, they'll say it's bullshit.

This rule holds, I am sorry to say, even for women who identify themselves as feminists. It held for Gloria Steinem, the famed feminist now in her 90s, who in 1998 defended Clinton amid his slew of sex scandals and abuse allegations in the pages of the New York Times, dismissing the allegations against him as trivial and making an unconvincing case that the offense she took at similar allegations against Clarence Thomas was different. It held true, most famously, for Bill Clinton's wife, the liberal feminist icon Hillary Clinton, who has remained silently beside her husband throughout each of the allegations against him - and retained her feminist credibility despite her loyalty to an allegedly abusive man that I can only describe as canine.

Moira Donegan is a Guardian US columnist