‘Slick talker’ v ‘sincere and truthful’: swing-state voters respond to VP debate
by Rachel Obordo and Jedidajah Otte from US news | The Guardian on (#6R7JB)
Despite varying reactions, voters we asked agreed Walz and Vance managed to treat each other with civility
Walz was rushing and appeared to want to discuss complex issues with depth but didn't have enough time to delve into some of the points. He had more substance and came across as more sincere than Vance, who was slick, polished and said little of consequence.
Continue reading...