Article 6WD6Z We asked camera companies why their RAW formats are all different and confusing

We asked camera companies why their RAW formats are all different and confusing

by
Antonio G. Di Benedetto
from The Verge on (#6WD6Z)
257572_Spec_Week_CVirginia_B_RAW.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0,0,100,100

When you set up a new camera, or even go to take a picture on some smartphones, youare presented with a key choice: JPG or RAW?

JPGs are ready to post just about anywhere, while RAWs yield an unfinished file filled with extra data that allows for much richer post-processing. That option for a RAW file (and even the generic name, RAW)has been standardized across the camera industry abut despite that, the camera world has never actually settled on one standardized RAW format.

Most cameras capture RAW files in proprietary formats, like Canonas CR3, Nikonas NEF, and Sonyas ARW. The result is a world of compatibility issues. Photo editing software needs to specifically support not just each manufactureras file type but also make changes for each new camera that shoots it. That creates pain for app developers and early camera adopters who want to know that their preferred software will just work.

Adobe tried to solve this problem years ago with a universal RAW format, DNG (Digital Negative), which it open-sourced for anyone to use. A handful of camera manufacturers have since adopted DNG as their RAW format. But the largest names in the space still use their own proprie …

Read the full story at The Verge.

External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://www.theverge.com/rss/index.xml
Feed Title The Verge
Feed Link https://www.theverge.com/
Reply 0 comments