The Antifa Terrorism Threat Trump Describes Does Not Exist

This article is republished fromThe Conversationunder a Creative Commons license. Read theoriginal article.

The State Department on July 16, 2026, hosted what officials billed as a ministerial onthe resurgence of left-wing political terrorism.

Secretary of StateMarco Rubio invited representatives from more than 60 countriesto Washington to hear an argument thatmany of them appear not to believe: that a transnational far-left terrorist movement called antifa threatens the democratic world. At the event, allies were asked to mobilize against that enemy despite nations like theNetherlandsandGermanypolitely noting to their host that they cannot find evidence of any such group.

Someintelligence analysts have declinedto brief on antifa at interagency meetings because they do not regard it as a serious counterterrorism threat.

Asa terrorism scholarwho spent a decade running the State Department office that designates terrorist organizations, I understand their confusion. The threat the administration describes does not exist in the form the administration describes it.

Antifa is not a group

As I and others have written before,antifa is not a group. It is a movement and an ideology,a loose commitment to opposing fascism. In its most organized form, it amounts to scattered local collectives likeRose City Antifain Portland, Oregon.

There is no membership roll, no command hierarchy and no funding structure. There is no leader of antifa - the Trump administrationhas not named one- and there isno record of deadly attacksattributed to a U.S.-based organization called antifa.

Groups like theIslamic State group and al-Qaidahave killed tens of thousands of people and havea documented chain of command. Antifa does not. You cannot decapitate a movement with no head, and you cannot sanction an organization that does not exist.

As such, the Trump administration created one.

Trump administration targets antifa

The construction project began on Sept. 22, 2025, when President Donald Trump signed anexecutive orderpurporting to designate antifa as a domestic terrorist organization. The order describes antifa as a militarist, anarchist enterprise that explicitly calls for the overthrow of the United States Government." It directs every relevant agency to investigate and dismantle its operations.

Two problems are immediately apparent. First,no legal authority existsto designate domestic organizations as terrorist groups. It's a gap that Congress has deliberately preserved for First Amendment reasons.

Second, the order designates as an organization something theFBI's past leadership has described as an ideology. Trump's executive order asserts an antifa enterprise into existence and then declares war on it.

Three days after the executive order, the White House implemented the order throughNational Security Presidential Memorandum 7, which converts the fiction into machinery. The memorandum directs the Treasury Department to identify and disrupt financial networks that fund what it deems domestic terrorism. The memorandum instructs banks to filesuspicious activity reportswith the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, the U.S. government's financial intelligence unit.

That means the government's financial surveillance apparatus, built to trace al-Qaida's money in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, is being pointed at Americans that the administration considers left-wing.

The memorandum likewisedirects the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Forcesto coordinate a comprehensive national strategy to investigate, prosecute and disrupt entities and individuals. That harnesses a network of roughly 200 task forces comprising over 4,000 personnel from federal, state and local agencies.

The wording of National Security Presidential Memorandum 7gives away the administration's true intent. It identifies the markers of this supposed terrorist movement as anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism and anti-Christianity. It criticizes the movement for its hostility toward those who hold traditional American views on family, religion and morality.

Those are not indicators of terrorism. They are political positions.

State Department targets groups overseas

The foreign component of the campaign arrived in November 2025. That's when the State Department designatedfour European groups- one each from Germany and Italy and two from Greece - as Specially Designated Global Terrorists andForeign Terrorist Organizationspursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act.

The State Department-designated groups are real. And some of their members have committed genuine crimes, includingassaults and small-scale bombings.

But asI have noted, the designations are very peculiar. These groups have committed vandalism and harmed people, but not one of the four has carried out an attack that led to any fatalities.

German leadershave said the threat from one of the designated groups,Antifa Ost, or Antifa East, had recently decreased significantly.

As the former head of the State Department's office that recommended to the secretary of state which groups to designate, I've been involved in the designations of hundreds of individuals and organizations. The bar was never this low. That's because the Foreign Terrorist Organization list loses its meaning, and its deterrent power, when it includes groups whose body count is zero while genuinely lethal movements go unlisted.

The foreign nexus

That brings us back to the State Department's ministerial. The sequence of events leading up to it matter:

Invent the organization by executive order; build the enforcement machinery by presidential memorandum; manufacture the foreign nexus through the State Department's Foreign Terrorist Organization designations; and then convene the world to ratify the story. Each step launders the previous one.

Behind it all, Trump administration officialshave discussed using the foreign terrorismlabels to justify going after Americans with links to the movement. That is the point of the exercise, and U.S allieslike the Netherlandshave explained how antifa could not be designated as a terrorist group under their laws.

Counterterrorism tools are among the most powerful instruments the U.S. government possesses. I don't believe that using them against an ideology, one defined by opposition to fascism, makes America safer. I believe it tells every ally the U.S. asks for help that the world's leading counterterrorism power can no longer tell the difference between a threat and an opponent.

Implications of the ministerial meeting

This is not just an issue of semantics and rhetoric - each action by the Trump administration against a strawman enemy creates risks. And the push to internationalize the antifa threat could have dire consequences at home.

First, if the State Department leaves the July 16 meeting with pliable allies willing to brand antifa a terrorist organization, it will embolden the administration to point to a supposed global conspiracy of the far left.

That path leads to a State Department foreign terrorist designation. Such a designation means Americans could have their bank accounts frozen and quite possibly find themselves rounded up for providing material support to a movement rather than an organization. This would be more dangerous than Trump's earlier executive order.

Second, it could chill freedom of speech and assembly. Once other governments treat antifa as a terrorist entity, the U.S. government gains cover to shut down protests under the guise of exposing global left-wing plotting.

Third, it could justify the revival of projects like theFBI's Counterintelligence Program, resurrecting the surveillance, infiltration and disruption of lawful political activity that the bureau was supposed to have abandoned after theabuses of the 1970s.

Fourth, asone European counterterrorism scholarrecently warned, the summit lays bare a widening split between American and European counterterrorism priorities and the Trump administration's willingness to bend counterterrorism policy to partisan ends.

That divergence is the real hazard, far more than any phantom left-wing terrorism group, because European counterterrorism leans so heavily on U.S. intelligence. As such, transatlantic counterterrorism cooperation could be in for turbulent times.

Whatever the outcome of the ministerial meeting, there is no version that will make Americans safer.

I believe one result is certain: Genuine threats - from groups with leaders, actual funding and malicious intent - will get less attention from the U.S. and any ally co-opted to take action against antifa.

Jason M. Blazakis is Professor of Practice and Director of Center on Terrorism, Extremism and Counterterrorism at Middlebury College