Lots of Ubuntu without systemd clones (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on 2015-04-26 08:27 (#7V75) In 3 ... 2... Re: Lots of Ubuntu without systemd clones (Score: 1) by zafiro17@pipedot.org on 2015-04-26 12:47 (#7VGG) That would be just fine with me. Currently there are too many Ubuntu derivatives, in my opinion. Time for a little more diversity in the ecosystem. Re: Lots of Ubuntu without systemd clones (Score: 1) by tanuki64@pipedot.org on 2015-04-26 12:49 (#7VGJ) Ubuntu derivatives? Or Debian derivatives? ;-) Re: Lots of Ubuntu without systemd clones (Score: 1) by nightsky30@pipedot.org on 2015-05-01 19:54 (#87KV) They are both tainted at this point.
Re: Lots of Ubuntu without systemd clones (Score: 1) by zafiro17@pipedot.org on 2015-04-26 12:47 (#7VGG) That would be just fine with me. Currently there are too many Ubuntu derivatives, in my opinion. Time for a little more diversity in the ecosystem. Re: Lots of Ubuntu without systemd clones (Score: 1) by tanuki64@pipedot.org on 2015-04-26 12:49 (#7VGJ) Ubuntu derivatives? Or Debian derivatives? ;-) Re: Lots of Ubuntu without systemd clones (Score: 1) by nightsky30@pipedot.org on 2015-05-01 19:54 (#87KV) They are both tainted at this point.
Re: Lots of Ubuntu without systemd clones (Score: 1) by tanuki64@pipedot.org on 2015-04-26 12:49 (#7VGJ) Ubuntu derivatives? Or Debian derivatives? ;-) Re: Lots of Ubuntu without systemd clones (Score: 1) by nightsky30@pipedot.org on 2015-05-01 19:54 (#87KV) They are both tainted at this point.
Re: Lots of Ubuntu without systemd clones (Score: 1) by nightsky30@pipedot.org on 2015-05-01 19:54 (#87KV) They are both tainted at this point.