FSF and SFC work with Canonical on an "intellectual property" policy update

The Free Software Foundation (FSF) and Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) have both put out statements about a change to the Canonical, Ltd. "intellectual property" policy that was negotiated over the last two years (FSF statement and SFC statement). Effectively, Canonical has added a "trump clause" that clarifies that the licenses of the individual packages override the Canonical policy when there is a conflict. Though, as SFC points out: "While a trump clause is a reasonable way to comply with the GPL in a secondary licensing document, the solution is far from ideal. Redistributors of Ubuntu have little choice but to become expert analysts of Canonical, Ltd.'s policy. They must identify on their own every place where the policy contradicts the GPL. If a dispute arises on a subtle issue, Canonical, Ltd. could take legal action, arguing that the redistributor's interpretation of GPL was incorrect. Even if the redistributor was correct that the GPL trumped some specific clause in Canonical, Ltd.'s policy, it may be costly to adjudicate the issue." While backing the change made, both FSF and SFC recommend further changes to make the situation even more clear.