Comment XZER Re: Some problems

Story

Li-Fi is 100 times faster than Wi-Fi. LED lights could be used for delivering data

Preview

Some problems (Score: 2, Informative)

by evilviper@pipedot.org on 2015-12-09 13:23 (#X500)

Of course this isn't the first time light has been used for computer communications. IrDA was the wireless communications protocol of choice before WiFi ever appeared, with IrLAN access point-type devices allowing rooms full of PDAs to connect to the local network, and the internet, wirelessly.

While WiFi is relatively slow, much faster WiDi/Miracast/WiGig has been around in niche applications for a few years. The high frequencies used have some of the same limitations as visible light communications, which has limited adoption thus far. Since people will continue to want WiFi, WiGig will integrate much better with it.

Li-Fi has some serious limitation... Significant expense to upgrade your lights, or at least their controllers. And only one-way communications at those speeds... Your computers, laptops and smartphones will need some way to send information back. That would mean lights in your devices, and optical pickups all over the building.

Re: Some problems (Score: 0)

by Anonymous Coward on 2015-12-11 08:20 (#XBPS)

Could be more useful as a backbone than having to run cables across a room. Or you could put it behind a false ceiling, and nobody would see it except for a technician who might clean a lens every few years.

Re: Some problems (Score: 0)

by Anonymous Coward on 2015-12-17 10:31 (#XZER)

It's a solved problem, especially for backbone links, and was the longhaul link of choice in every large LAN infrastructure project I've ever seen.

Junk Status

Marked as [Not Junk] by bryan@pipedot.org on 2016-05-06 23:17