Twitter reacts to Bruins' disallowed OT goal

Upon further review, no goal.

Boston Bruins forward Noal Acciari appeared to score a season-saving overtime goal Friday in Game 5, but it was disallowed after video review due to goaltender interference on the part of Sean Kuraly.

Judge for yourself:

Bruins potential game-winning goal, ruled goaltender interference on the ice pic.twitter.com/fFBGeJQi5D

- Pete Blackburn (@PeteBlackburn) April 22, 2017

The reaction on Twitter was, in a word, befuddled:

Wow. No goal. I think it's a good goal but we could debate it for the next two days & not agree. The issue w/reviewing goalie interference.

- Craig Custance (@CraigCustance) April 22, 2017

<raises hand> I think that's the right call!

- Sean Gentille (@seangentille) April 22, 2017

I see zero goaltender interference on that play.

- Ken Campbell (@THNKenCampbell) April 22, 2017

Ah yes. Now I know what goaltender interference is. And is not. I think. Maybe....

- Travis Yost (@travisyost) April 22, 2017

I have no idea what's a good goal anymore. To me, that one should count.

- Al Muir (@almuirSI) April 22, 2017

Leave it Roberto Luongo to drop some gold:

Good goal cuz a game 6 is good for HRR?

- Strombone (@strombone1) April 22, 2017

No goal cuz Gary hates the players.....

- Strombone (@strombone1) April 22, 2017

A former NHL official also chimed in:

Bruins goal should be good...but??

- Kerry Fraser (@kfraserthecall) April 22, 2017

then again?? Who knows?

- Kerry Fraser (@kfraserthecall) April 22, 2017

Good effort, Bruins.

Excellent "pretend we don't see the ref" fake celebration by the Bruins, by the way.

- Down Goes Brown (@DownGoesBrown) April 22, 2017

Copyright (C) 2017 Score Media Ventures Inc. All rights reserved. Certain content reproduced under license.