Vetter: Why no 2D Userspace API in DRM?

On his blog, Daniel Vetter answers an often-asked question about why the direct rendering manager (DRM) does not have a 2D API (and won't in the future): "3D has it easy: There's OpenGL and Vulkan and DirectX that require a certain feature set. And huge market forces that make sure if you use these features like a game would, rendering is fast.Aside: This means the 2D engine in a browser actually needs to work like a 3D action game, or the GPU will crawl. The [impedance] mismatch compared to traditional 2D rendering designs is huge.On the 2D side there's no such thing: Every blitter engine is its own bespoke thing, with its own features, limitations and performance characteristics. There's also no standard benchmarks that would drive common performance characteristics - today blitters are [needed] mostly in small systems, with very specific use cases. Anything big enough to run more generic workloads will have a 3D rendering block anyway. These systems still have blitters, but mostly just to help move data in and out of VRAM for the 3D engine to consume."