Article 4ZDGQ [font-faces, Web-fonts] ttf works. Why should I use woff?

[font-faces, Web-fonts] ttf works. Why should I use woff?

by
Michael Uplawski
from LinuxQuestions.org on (#4ZDGQ)
Howdy.

Ever since there have been @font-faces, I use to embed Open-Font-licensed fonts and those for which I have the authorization by the font-author, in my web-pages.

For the time, all the css which is concerned, references either TrueType or OpenType fonts (.ttf or .otf). I cannot see and do not have feedback about dysfunctional font-settings in any of these pages.

I can convert fonts to woff (or woff2), but why should I ?
While there appears to be additional information for the interpreting software (AKA Web-browser), apart from the licensing information I see no use for this. The compression rate impresses the adepts of woff2 but it only means that the font-files on a server are smaller. I use.., like 3.., fonts on a site and seriously do not care about the file-size of my font-files.

Q1:Does anybody wish to disable support for .ttf and .otf in font-faces in the near future?

Q2:What else could be a (really good) reason to convert original font-files to woff/woff2 and to modify my style-sheets in accordance?latest?d=yIl2AUoC8zA latest?i=poF1UqowFiU:fpvLQPybrMc:F7zBnMy latest?i=poF1UqowFiU:fpvLQPybrMc:V_sGLiP latest?d=qj6IDK7rITs latest?i=poF1UqowFiU:fpvLQPybrMc:gIN9vFwpoF1UqowFiU
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location https://feeds.feedburner.com/linuxquestions/latest
Feed Title LinuxQuestions.org
Feed Link https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/
Reply 0 comments