Article 54C83 And that’s really it for Google+

And that’s really it for Google+

by
Frederic Lardinois
from Crunch Hype on (#54C83)

Last year, Google launched the beta of Currents, which was essentially a rebrand of Google+ for G Suite users, since Google+ for consumers went to meet its maker in April 2019. While Google+ was meant to be an all-purpose social network, the idea behind Currents is more akin to what Microsoft is doing with Yammer or Facebook with Workplace. It's meant to give employees a forum for internal discussions and announcements.

googleplus-512-red.png

To complicate matters, Google kept Google+ around, even after the launch of Currents, but in an email to G Suite admins, it has now announced that Google+ for G Suite will close its doors on July 6, after which there will be no way to opt out of Currents or revert back to Google+.

And with that, Google has driven the final nail into Google+'s coffin. The Google+ mobile apps will be automatically updated to Currents. All existing links to Google+ will redirect to Currents.

Going forward, Google+ will only live on as a hazy memory, filled with circles of friends, all of which were forced to use their real name (at least at the beginning), +1 buttons everywhere, sparks and the promise of fun games, ripples and more.

Currents is all business - and while I'm not aware of a lot of companies that use it, it looks to be a solid option for companies that would otherwise use the Yammer/Teams combination in the Microsoft ecosystem. Now, I guess, we can start the countdown before Google launches another social network.

If you want to take a stroll down memory lane, check out our history of Google+ below:

Looking back at Google+

Techcrunch?d=2mJPEYqXBVI Techcrunch?d=7Q72WNTAKBA Techcrunch?d=yIl2AUoC8zA Techcrunch?i=czpkCGVri_4:17ZP9AsUWQ0:-BT Techcrunch?i=czpkCGVri_4:17ZP9AsUWQ0:D7D Techcrunch?d=qj6IDK7rITsczpkCGVri_4
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.feedburner.com/TechCrunch/
Feed Title Crunch Hype
Feed Link https://techncruncher.blogspot.com/
Reply 0 comments