Installer issue with multiple encrypted file systems
by taylorkh from LinuxQuestions.org on (#5ETBE)
I am trying to perform an installation as follows:
/boot - 512 MB not encrypted
/ - 12288 MB encrypted
/home - 4096 MB encrypted
Initially I tried Linux Mint 20. It did not work and as I was investigating filing a bug I suspected that the same installer is used by Ubuntu. It seems to be. I have the same issue. Here are (I hope) three screen shots showing how I have the proposed partitioning scheme and what happens.
https://i.postimg.cc/k2KhhcWQ/Ubuntu-pic1.png
https://i.postimg.cc/VSFZzkG5/Ubuntu-pic2.png
https://i.postimg.cc/XZWDMCgT/Ubuntu-pic3.png
I have tried both primary and logical partitions. It make no difference. I am running a similar scheme on my CentOS 7 workstation. I set it up a couple of years ago using the CentOS installer. Is this not supported in Ubuntu? Should I file a bug against Ubuntu or does the installer belong to Debian (with which I have NO experience.)
TIA,
Ken
/boot - 512 MB not encrypted
/ - 12288 MB encrypted
/home - 4096 MB encrypted
Initially I tried Linux Mint 20. It did not work and as I was investigating filing a bug I suspected that the same installer is used by Ubuntu. It seems to be. I have the same issue. Here are (I hope) three screen shots showing how I have the proposed partitioning scheme and what happens.
https://i.postimg.cc/k2KhhcWQ/Ubuntu-pic1.png
https://i.postimg.cc/VSFZzkG5/Ubuntu-pic2.png
https://i.postimg.cc/XZWDMCgT/Ubuntu-pic3.png
I have tried both primary and logical partitions. It make no difference. I am running a similar scheme on my CentOS 7 workstation. I set it up a couple of years ago using the CentOS installer. Is this not supported in Ubuntu? Should I file a bug against Ubuntu or does the installer belong to Debian (with which I have NO experience.)
TIA,
Ken