The Ghislaine Maxwell case raises a question some may think naive: why? | Jonathan Freedland

Faced with profound human wickedness, the most basic question of all is the one we rarely ask

The Ghislaine Maxwell case raises so many questions, and yet scarcely discussed is the one that perhaps matters most. Naturally, there's huge interest in whether Maxwell, convicted this week of recruiting and grooming teenage girls for sex with her one-time boyfriend Jeffrey Epstein, will seek to reduce her sentence by naming names - opening up the pair's notorious little black book and telling prosecutors who else among the rich and powerful abused the vulnerable minors Maxwell trafficked for sex.

In Britain, much of that interest focuses on Epstein's longtime pal, Prince Andrew, who was so close to the couple he invited them on visits to Balmoral, Sandringham and Windsor: it's lucky the prince doesn't sweat, because if he did, he might be drenched now. So far he has refused to answer US investigators' questions - not for his own sake, you understand, but according to multiple reports, to save the Queen from embarrassment. Because a 61-year-old man hiding behind his 95-year-old mother would not be in the least bit mortifying.

Jonathan Freedland is a Guardian columnist