Judge agrees Musk’s buddy David Sacks is fighting a subpoena for podcast clout
by Richard Lawler from The Verge - All Posts on (#636F3)
Alex Castro / The Verge Twitter's lawyers argued David Sacks' main reason for trying to fight a subpoena filed in their case against Elon Musk is because he said he would on a podcast, and in a ruling issued Friday, the judge agreed.
Chancellor Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick (pdf):
In an apparent effort to keep Sacks's promise to his podcast listeners, the movants created the very burden of which they now complain.
The Motion to Quash is denied.
the subpoena recipient Tweets the subpoenaing attorneys the middle finger
This closes a side story to the main event of Twitter suing Elon Musk over his attempt to get out of their $44 billion acquisition agreement after the company's lawyers subpoenaed Sacks as a potential investor in the merger Musk seeks to...