Irritating, yes. Silly, yes. But Harry and Meghan are right on one thing: press persecution | Catherine Bennett

The Netflix drama reveals the depths to which some of the reporting has sunk

If Harry & Meghan, the series, didn't please everyone, Prince Andrew must have adored it. Beyond group pictures, not even a glimpse of Andrew (the Epstein/Maxwell favourite still embedded in a Windsor mansion after the 12m settlement of a contested sex claim) was deployed to underline the non-compromised couple's contrasting exile from their tribe, for reasons that seem largely to do with resentment, carelessness and pettiness.

Since likewise overlooked are the King's mishaps with donors and honours, his grotesque first marriage and ditto enthusiasms for Laurens van der Post and Jimmy Savile, there was much for him and the extended family to celebrate. What an example to The Crown! The Windsors' many embarrassments scarcely featured, even in sections where scholars offered long views on the ducal couple's struggle, including unexpected connections with Brexit, Stephen Lawrence and the Grenfell Tower fire. What little, after some baleful trailers, the programmes firmly alleged about Harry's relations - shouting, plotting and neglect - left them looking not much worse than the dysfunctional, emotionally stunted zoo exhibits we already know them to be.