Jim Ratcliffe, Manchester United and the myth of the spotless billionaire | Aaron Timms

In an era when clubs have become the playthings of billionaires, fans are left pondering the question: how do you prefer your sportswashing?

When Qatar's Sheikh Jassim bin Hamad al-Thani withdrew from the race to buy Manchester United last month, you could almost hear the sighs of relief emanating from the press department on Sir Matt Busby Way.

A Qatari takeover, despite the appeal and simplicity of Sheikh Jassim's all-cash offer, would be sure to face fierce criticism - not only on the basis of Qatar's enduringly appalling human rights record, but as further proof of oil money's deepening incursion into global soccer's most sacred places. With this ethical conundrum out of the way, the path is now clear for a much easier publicity sell: Manchester United looks set to fall into the care of a footballing humanitarian who presents the unique advantage of being both obscenely rich and unimpeachably English. Finally, the self-styled biggest club on the planet will be yanked away from the pesky Americans, snatched from the slick hands of the Gulf, and come to nestle at the top of Sir Jim Ratcliffe's corporate crown - pending a final buyout of the Glazers' remaining 75% stake. A victory, at last, for clean money, good money, English money.